Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicolle Tulve |
17 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda McCauley |
20 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Alavanja |
27 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda McCauley |
6 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicolle Tulve |
4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Asa Bradman |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.