Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
14 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JG Brody |
24 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Infante |
8 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JG Brody |
30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Infante |
2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
6 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
6 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-11-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.