Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of kidney cancer models showing degree of smoothing and global test statistic

From: Spatial analysis of bladder, kidney, and pancreatic cancer on upper Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to case-control data

Analysis

Latency (yrs)

Spana

Cases/Controlsd

Deviance p-valuee

Figure #

Crude

All Residences

0

0.95

54/1220

<0.001

--

Crude

All Residences

0

0.90b

54/1220

-----f

4a

Adjusted

All Residences

0

0.90

54/1220

<0.001

4b

Adjusted

All Residences

0

0.40c

54/1220

-----f

4c

Adjusted

All Residences

0

0.15c

54/1220

-----f

4d

  1. Span is the percentage of data used for smoothing the model.
  2. a Optimal span obtained by using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) unless otherwise noted.
  3. b Same span as for adjusted, all residences.
  4. c Local minimum span was used.
  5. d Number of residences contributed to the analysis by participant status.
  6. e Null hypothesis is that the map is flat.
  7. f The p-values were omitted because the maps were created using a non-optimal span.