Skip to main content

Table 6 Pearson correlations for performance Criterion B across the range of adjustment methods investigated for NHANES 2009–2012 (CDC, 2015) (testing dataset)

From: Assessing urinary flow rate, creatinine, osmolality and other hydration adjustment methods for urinary biomonitoring using NHANES arsenic, iodine, lead and cadmium data

Adjustment method

rp (95 % CI)

Pb

Cd

Unadjusted

0.67 (0.61, 0.72)

de

0.58 (0.51, 0.64)

d

Creatinine

0.79 (0.75, 0.82)

ab

0.65 (0.59, 0.70)

ab

Osmolality

0.81 (0.78, 0.84)

a

0.66 (0.60, 0.71)

a

ER

0.69 (0.63,0.73)

d

0.59 (0.52, 0.64)

dc

ERBW

0.63 (0.57, 0.68)

e

0.57 (0.50, 0.63)

d

UFRA

0.74 (0.70, 0.78)

c

0.62 (0.56, 0.67)

bc

UFRB

0.75 (0.70, 0.79)

bc

0.62 (0.56, 0.68)

b

  1. Correlations were calculated on natural log transformed data. All correlations are significance to p < 0.001. Bold font denotes the best performing adjustment method for each analyte. Correlations share a letter when not significantly different from one another