Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of the regression coefficients, their standard errors (SE)(x10-4) and relative bias of 48,000 simulated datasets on the impact of mixture error model on 2-pollutant Poisson regression. Results presented for the core scenario (Area: Europe, Error type: Additive-Mixture) and sensitivity analyses (N = 48,000 in each row)

From: Quantifying the short-term effects of air pollution on health in the presence of exposure measurement error: a simulation study of multi-pollutant model results

Sensitivity Analysis

CRFsa:

PM2.5: β1 = 5.4a

NO2: β2 = 6a

Scenario

\( {\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{1}} \)

(SEW)/(SEB)b

Bias (%)c

\( {\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}}_{\mathbf{2}} \)

(SEW)/(SEB)b

Bias (%)c

Main Analysis (Europe-Mixture)

5.33

(1.49)/(3.57)

−1.3

4.36

(2.00)/(5.10)

−27.4

Different “true” CRFs

Low effect CRFd

2.66

(1.50)/(3.53)

−1.5

2.19

(2.00)/(4.79)

−27.0

High effect CRFe

10.66

(1.47)/(3.73)

−1.3

8.78

(1.97)/(6.05)

−26.9

Only PM2.5 effect

4.85

(1.50)/(3.57)

−10.2

0.13

(2.02)/(4.76)

Only NO2 effect

0.44

(1.50)/(3.55)

4.35

(2.02)/(5.05)

−27.5

Mixture error percentages

(Classical,Berkson)

PM2.5: (55,45%), NO2: (45,55%)

5.20

(1.46)/(3.54)

−3.6

4.47

(1.83)/(4.59)

−25.6

(Classical,Berkson)

PM2.5: (70,30%), NO2: (60,40%)

5.08

(1.42)/(3.45)

−6.0

4.48

(1.70)/(4.26)

−25.4

Error type

Multiplicative

0.83

(0.27)/(1.92)

−84.5

0.61

(0.27)/(1.68)

−90.0

  1. aConcentration-response functions for the generation of the health outcome
  2. b SEW: Within-simulations (or model-based) standard error, SEB: Between-simulations (or empirical) standard error
  3. c Relative bias = \( \frac{\left({\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}}_{\boldsymbol{\iota}}-{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\right)}{{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{\boldsymbol{\iota}}} \)
  4. d Half the CRF from Mills et al. 2006
  5. e Twice the CRF from Mills et al. 2006